Despite widespread headlines and a vocal contingent of supporters demanding change, Daniel Farke has not resigned as manager of Leeds United. The narrative of a “huge resignation bombshell” does not align with current reports, which instead point to mounting pressure for him to be sacked by the club’s hierarchy. Farke’s position has come under intense scrutiny, particularly following a concerning slide down the Premier League table after securing promotion. Recent results, including a 2-1 home defeat, have exacerbated the frustration felt by the passionate Leeds fanbase, some of whom have publicly called for the German head coach’s dismissal. A recent fan poll on social media reportedly showed an overwhelming majority wanting the manager to be axed, reflecting the deep dissatisfaction with the team’s performances and Farke’s tactical approaches, especially away from home. Farke, however, has publicly shared the fans’ “anger and disappointment,” stating he understands the passion and doesn’t want the supporters to change. He has also been defiant regarding his future, saying he isn’t worried and that “if you can’t handle the heat, don’t become a manager of Leeds United.” The pressure isn’t just external. Reports indicate that the 49ers Enterprises ownership at Elland Road has held reservations about Farke’s ability to handle the step up to the top flight, despite his success in guiding the team to promotion. His previous Premier League record with Norwich City—which included two relegations—has fueled these doubts. While some reports suggested the club was plotting a shock exit for Farke even after securing promotion, Chairman Paraag Marathe has previously shut down these rumors, confirming Farke would be leading the team. However, poor form and the club’s slide into the relegation zone have intensified boardroom discussions. The current situation remains volatile, with Farke fighting to prove his ability to navigate a difficult Premier League campaign against a backdrop of increasing fan dissent and ownership skepticism.